Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
Search
Latest topics
» Brazil vs Mexico June 3rd 2012
by PG-Boy Yesterday at 9:10 pm
» 01 FC Dallas South Classic D-2
by rdg Yesterday at 8:35 pm
» 03 Boys Development
by 1crazysoccermama Yesterday at 7:21 pm
» Andromeda FC 01 Boys - Pre Academy May 22nd & 24th
by Mean Green Yesterday at 5:30 pm
» Coach Zeph Badii??
by rvpformvp Yesterday at 4:16 pm
» question about a Release to Rec.
by soccermom97b Yesterday at 4:06 pm
» Ken Smith Challenge Games - Predictions
by soccerpapa Yesterday at 4:01 pm
» Top 25 Human Ranking
by Ibystander Yesterday at 3:45 pm
» AYSES 95 Boys White Looking for a Few Players
by txsnowman Yesterday at 2:46 pm
» Anyone have history on CCSAI MANCHESTER 00B (TXN)
by Thunder3 Yesterday at 2:43 pm
» 02' field player looking for the right Team & Coach
by chaparro Yesterday at 1:39 pm
» Ken smith predictions for 01?
by peregrino Yesterday at 1:06 pm
» Solar 95 Boys White
by BlackRose Yesterday at 12:59 pm
» U15/16 Boys - AFC adidas Tournament - TEAM NEEDED
by coachdom Yesterday at 12:49 pm
» Dallas Texans 01B North (Classic D3) is looking for players
by Chappie81 Yesterday at 12:25 pm
by PG-Boy Yesterday at 9:10 pm
» 01 FC Dallas South Classic D-2
by rdg Yesterday at 8:35 pm
» 03 Boys Development
by 1crazysoccermama Yesterday at 7:21 pm
» Andromeda FC 01 Boys - Pre Academy May 22nd & 24th
by Mean Green Yesterday at 5:30 pm
» Coach Zeph Badii??
by rvpformvp Yesterday at 4:16 pm
» question about a Release to Rec.
by soccermom97b Yesterday at 4:06 pm
» Ken Smith Challenge Games - Predictions
by soccerpapa Yesterday at 4:01 pm
» Top 25 Human Ranking
by Ibystander Yesterday at 3:45 pm
» AYSES 95 Boys White Looking for a Few Players
by txsnowman Yesterday at 2:46 pm
» Anyone have history on CCSAI MANCHESTER 00B (TXN)
by Thunder3 Yesterday at 2:43 pm
» 02' field player looking for the right Team & Coach
by chaparro Yesterday at 1:39 pm
» Ken smith predictions for 01?
by peregrino Yesterday at 1:06 pm
» Solar 95 Boys White
by BlackRose Yesterday at 12:59 pm
» U15/16 Boys - AFC adidas Tournament - TEAM NEEDED
by coachdom Yesterday at 12:49 pm
» Dallas Texans 01B North (Classic D3) is looking for players
by Chappie81 Yesterday at 12:25 pm
Most active topics
Most Viewed Topics
Top posters
| omega striker (2075) | ||||
| go99 (2013) | ||||
| finish1 (1427) | ||||
| Axxman (982) | ||||
| my2cents (816) | ||||
| The German (815) | ||||
| Ibystander (766) | ||||
| plantit (687) | ||||
| soccerrus2 (647) | ||||
| gababa (572) |
Top posting users this week
Any teams NOT rostering 16 this year?

RedBaron- Posts: 31
Join date: 2009-06-29
Location: Looking for 81
soccersoccersoccer wrote:Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
OUTSTANDING. This means you had players playing the game and NOT sitting on the bench. Personally, would LOVE to see max roster of 14 through U17. Let the kids PLAY!

The German- Posts: 815
Join date: 2009-06-21
Location: Far far from home
Careful what you wish for. We had only 14 on the roster last year and had only 2 games with all of them.RedBaron wrote:soccersoccersoccer wrote:Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
OUTSTANDING. This means you had players playing the game and NOT sitting on the bench. Personally, would LOVE to see max roster of 14 through U17. Let the kids PLAY!
The rest between 10-12 players because of injuries or sickness. The older they get the bigger you want your roster IMO.

soccer geek- Posts: 46
Join date: 2009-06-21
RedBaron wrote:soccersoccersoccer wrote:Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
OUTSTANDING. This means you had players playing the game and NOT sitting on the bench. Personally, would LOVE to see max roster of 14 through U17. Let the kids PLAY!
14 max through U17? Really?. That's ridiculous. Have you ever seen the older age groups play? The game gets a lot faster and more physical as they get older (I really noticed a difference at U13 and another jump at U14). Add to that the games are longer and you will see at least twice the number of injuries at these ages than what you have seen at U11. On top of that once they get to 7th grade school sports start, and no matter how much you tell them "soccer comes first", there are always conflicts with school sports for a portion of your roster. Other "required" school activities also kick in (band contests, etc). You will find by U14 if you have 16 on the roster there will be games that you only have 11 or 12 available. Have fun with 14 though if that floats your boat.

mrclean- Posts: 269
Join date: 2009-06-24
I wished it stayed at 18 for U16-U19 as well. Too many kids on the bench. I've always wondered why they changed it to 22.

nuchad- Posts: 106
Join date: 2010-06-06
soccer geek wrote:RedBaron wrote:soccersoccersoccer wrote:Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
OUTSTANDING. This means you had players playing the game and NOT sitting on the bench. Personally, would LOVE to see max roster of 14 through U17. Let the kids PLAY!
14 max through U17? Really?. That's ridiculous. Have you ever seen the older age groups play? The game gets a lot faster and more physical as they get older (I really noticed a difference at U13 and another jump at U14). Add to that the games are longer and you will see at least twice the number of injuries at these ages than what you have seen at U11. On top of that once they get to 7th grade school sports start, and no matter how much you tell them "soccer comes first", there are always conflicts with school sports for a portion of your roster. Other "required" school activities also kick in (band contests, etc). You will find by U14 if you have 16 on the roster there will be games that you only have 11 or 12 available. Have fun with 14 though if that floats your boat.
really, you have people in the band on your team??? hmmm. not that there's anything wrong with that...

Axxman- Posts: 982
Join date: 2009-07-09
soccer geek wrote:RedBaron wrote:soccersoccersoccer wrote:Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
OUTSTANDING. This means you had players playing the game and NOT sitting on the bench. Personally, would LOVE to see max roster of 14 through U17. Let the kids PLAY!
14 max through U17? Really?. That's ridiculous. Have you ever seen the older age groups play? The game gets a lot faster and more physical as they get older (I really noticed a difference at U13 and another jump at U14). Add to that the games are longer and you will see at least twice the number of injuries at these ages than what you have seen at U11. On top of that once they get to 7th grade school sports start, and no matter how much you tell them "soccer comes first", there are always conflicts with school sports for a portion of your roster. Other "required" school activities also kick in (band contests, etc). You will find by U14 if you have 16 on the roster there will be games that you only have 11 or 12 available. Have fun with 14 though if that floats your boat.
So is your bb "little soccer geek"?

wayoutwest- Posts: 27
Join date: 2009-06-23
Age: 46
Location: The pitch.
Soccer geek your words of wisdom are perfect, I couldn't have said it better.

Ibystander- Posts: 766
Join date: 2009-08-03
soccersoccersoccer wrote:Our team has decided to go with14 on the roster this year. Picked up #15 and #16 last year last minute and did not prove to help us at all. Boys seemed to do better at the games we only had a sub or 2, we def played better when our core 11 were on the field. I know the argument against this may be less team money or what if a few injuries happen. I think Barcelona only had 13 last year and they did very well. Our boys strong point is endurance so hopefully this works out for us!
I think you'll be fine with 14. Comets Blue only had 12 on their roster last year and added only one more at the end of July. It could get tough with the injuries and school obligations, though, but at least the kids will have a lot of playing time.

TRUmom- Posts: 32
Join date: 2010-08-06
We sat with 15 last year and even then had a couple games where we had 0 or 1 sub. Injuries, illness and religion can bring your roster size down to a minimum quickly. I am sitting with 15 again this year but may look to pick up a couple extra throughout the year. I agree with the older they get the more you need to handle the injuries and other commitments that happen as they get older. As much as we all want them to make every practice and game, it's not realistic to expect that will happen so you have to add extra players to compensate for that.

Seinfeld4- Posts: 377
Join date: 2009-06-23
Location: Starting......NOW
Trumom,
Who does your BB play for?
Who does your BB play for?

TRUmom- Posts: 32
Join date: 2010-08-06
Texas Rage United 99 (PPL)

Seinfeld4- Posts: 377
Join date: 2009-06-23
Location: Starting......NOW
My bb plays for Triumph.


