TEXAS BOYS SOCCER FORUM

CHECK OUT THE NEW TXSOCCER GROUP ON FACEBOOK....come join now!
Visit the Girls Forum at:   www.txsoccer.net
** PLEASE START NEW THREADS WITH AGE GROUP **

Latest topics

» Kickball vs possession soccer
by bigtex75081 Today at 1:45 pm

» Wizards 02 Boys
by OnestrikeOnegoal Today at 1:25 pm

» Premier League West Champions.
by soccerdad96b Today at 1:23 pm

» Integrity Of Coaches Bio's
by Laimport Today at 12:36 pm

» rumor has it
by chino Today at 11:23 am

» Classic League - Is there a better way to develop?
by Laimport Today at 8:10 am

» Recommendation for good private skills?
by fsmagic10 Yesterday at 10:21 pm

» New Top Ten (11)
by accidentalelbow Yesterday at 8:58 pm

» 01 spring week 2 predictions
by cts Yesterday at 1:59 pm

» 99 Unrestricted Spring League
by U90C Yesterday at 11:17 am

» Interesting 02 games February 11
by futbolista Yesterday at 11:01 am

» 2012 Spring Season
by Number13 Yesterday at 7:26 am

» US U-23 MNT to play Mexico U-23 in Frisco
by drsoccer Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:09 pm

» Parking at the Complex at FC Dallas Statium - February 11
by afrankw Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:00 am

» 01 CL Week 2
by Ace70 Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:00 pm

Top posters

go99 (1891)
 
omega striker (1848)
 
finish1 (1324)
 
Axxman (980)
 
The German (759)
 
Ibystander (732)
 
my2cents (719)
 
plantit (675)
 
soccerrus2 (646)
 
gababa (572)
 

February 2012

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829   

Calendar Calendar

Rss feeds

Yahoo! 
Google Reader 
MSN 
AOL 
NewsGator 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 

    Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Share

    soccer23

    Posts: 303
    Join date: 2010-08-09

    Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  soccer23 on Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:50 pm

    Based on the Flight Results Grid, CL's team rankings are as follows:

    Division 1

    1. FC Dallas Premier (Pino)
    2. Dallas Texans (Gall) (guess the League not impressed with the double digit shutouts in the QT)
    3. Wizards (Burciaga)
    4. Solar Red (Adame)
    5. TFC (Wells)
    6. Solar (Partain)
    7. Andromeda Red (Leite)
    8. Bandits (Wright)
    9. FC Dallas East (Spencer)
    10. Dallas Texans Red (Craft)
    11. Andromeda White (Uremovich)
    12. ASG FC Gold North (Ekeme)
    13. DFW Tejanos (Parrish)
    14. Texas Toros S.C. (Calvillo)
    15. Dallasa Tigres Academy (Ortiz)
    16. Liverpool FC Kuyt (Ravestjin)
    17. North Texas Stirkers (Lopez)
    18. Odyssey (Gallagher)
    19. TFC White (Schell)
    20. Fort Worth Futol (Remmel)

    Division 2

    1. FC Dallas Youth (Suarez)
    2. Hurst United SA (Dane)
    3. AC Longview (Yoder)
    4. CD Chivas (Hernandez)
    5. Dallas Texans White (Connell)
    6. Mitlan (Posadas) (lots of respect for a team that didn't win a game in the QT)
    7. TFC Blue (Garrett)
    8. Comets SC (Badii)
    9. Kernow Storm FC (Penna)
    10. Andromeda SC (McLemore)

    afrankw

    Posts: 362
    Join date: 2009-06-28
    Age: 50

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  afrankw on Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:48 pm

    soccer23 wrote:Based on the Flight Results Grid, CL's team rankings are as follows:

    Division 1

    1. FC Dallas Premier (Pino)
    2. Dallas Texans (Gall) (guess the League not impressed with the double digit shutouts in the QT)
    3. Wizards (Burciaga)
    4. Solar Red (Adame)
    5. TFC (Wells)
    6. Solar (Partain)
    7. Andromeda Red (Leite)
    8. Bandits (Wright)
    9. FC Dallas East (Spencer)
    10. Dallas Texans Red (Craft)
    11. Andromeda White (Uremovich)
    12. ASG FC Gold North (Ekeme)
    13. DFW Tejanos (Parrish)
    14. Texas Toros S.C. (Calvillo)
    15. Dallasa Tigres Academy (Ortiz)
    16. Liverpool FC Kuyt (Ravestjin)
    17. North Texas Stirkers (Lopez)
    18. Odyssey (Gallagher)
    19. TFC White (Schell)
    20. Fort Worth Futol (Remmel)

    Division 2

    1. FC Dallas Youth (Suarez)
    2. Hurst United SA (Dane)
    3. AC Longview (Yoder)
    4. CD Chivas (Hernandez)
    5. Dallas Texans White (Connell)
    6. Mitlan (Posadas) (lots of respect for a team that didn't win a game in the QT)
    7. TFC Blue (Garrett)
    8. Comets SC (Badii)
    9. Kernow Storm FC (Penna)
    10. Andromeda SC (McLemore)


    The seeding are based on the QT seedings. If you look at 1 - 10 the are winners of brackets A - J. If you look at round two. Mitlan was the 2nd D2 team in bracket A which would make them #6.

    soccer23

    Posts: 303
    Join date: 2010-08-09

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  soccer23 on Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:00 pm

    I don't know. Wouldn't that make Comets first (2nd seed in Bracket B) and how could Chivas be ahead of Andromeda (McClemore)?

    afrankw

    Posts: 362
    Join date: 2009-06-28
    Age: 50

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  afrankw on Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:13 pm

    soccer23 wrote:I don't know. Wouldn't that make Comets first (2nd seed in Bracket B) and how could Chivas be ahead of Andromeda (McClemore)?


    Not that it really matters as they get to decide the rankings on the pitch. It looks like they did D2 based on points in round two.

    002) FC DALLAS YOUTH 00B (SUAREZ)  11
    003) HURST UNITED SA 00B (DANE)  10
    004) CD CHIVAS 00B (HERNANDEZ)  10
    004) AC LONGVIEW 00B (YODER)  10
    004) DALLAS TEXANS SC 00B WHITE (CONNELL)  8
    004) MITLAN 00B (POSADAS)  7
    003) TFC 00B BLUE (GARRETT)  4
    002) COMETS SC 00B (BADII)  2
    003) KERNOW STORM FC 00B (PENNA)  1
    003) ANDROMEDA SC 00B (MCLEMORE)  0

    soccer23

    Posts: 303
    Join date: 2010-08-09

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  soccer23 on Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:23 pm

    That looks right frank. And you are correct, pre-season means nothing at the end of the season.

    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Guest on Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:57 pm

    anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar

    Middie 07

    Posts: 72
    Join date: 2010-07-19

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Middie 07 on Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:50 pm

    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar

    I'll take a shot - DT Red - Craft will eventually be the better team.

    omega striker

    Posts: 1848
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  omega striker on Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:09 pm

    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?

    omega striker

    Posts: 1848
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  omega striker on Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:10 pm

    Middie 07 wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar

    I'll take a shot - DT Red - Craft will eventually be the better team.
    not to sure about that one?

    forbin

    Posts: 222
    Join date: 2009-09-29

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  forbin on Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:14 pm

    omega striker wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?


    Did SR lose a lot of good players in June?

    omega striker

    Posts: 1848
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  omega striker on Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:37 pm

    forbin wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?


    Did SR lose a lot of good players in June?
    quite a few "skilled" players but picked up some taller faster players so...... not to sure what happened myself?

    Middie 07

    Posts: 72
    Join date: 2010-07-19

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Middie 07 on Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:58 pm

    omega striker wrote:
    forbin wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?


    Did SR lose a lot of good players in June?
    quite a few "skilled" players but picked up some taller faster players so...... not to sure what happened myself?


    Something to consider ... the '00 teams have been playing a lot of intense soccer the past two months getting ready for QT & then the QT itself. Compared to this the '99 teams have had the summer off. My son's '00 has also been beating/playing level w/ a classic '99 team on a regular basis but I would not put much stock in it until they do the same come November after both have been in season. I would expect the '00's to be better conditioned given the 16 straight days of 100-degree heat they have been playing or practicing in. That will take a bite into the size/speed advantage the extra year gives the '99's.

    go99

    Posts: 1891
    Join date: 2009-07-09
    Location: Standing next to Klinsmann wispering in his ear.

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  go99 on Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:19 pm

    I doubt solar red had the summer off to chill and relax. There has to be a little more to it than that. Maybe the players they lost had a bigger impact than they thought. I know one player they lost, there is no way they found a comparable replacement. Gonna say I called it on Gall and can't wait to see the showdown with FCD prem. The solar red collapse deserves it's own topic so I started one. Someone give us the real story. Let's not sugar coat this. Besides no one is listening

    omega striker

    Posts: 1848
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  omega striker on Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:02 pm

    Middie 07 wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    forbin wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?


    Did SR lose a lot of good players in June?
    quite a few "skilled" players but picked up some taller faster players so...... not to sure what happened myself?


    Something to consider ... the '00 teams have been playing a lot of intense soccer the past two months getting ready for QT & then the QT itself. Compared to this the '99 teams have had the summer off. My son's '00 has also been beating/playing level w/ a classic '99 team on a regular basis but I would not put much stock in it until they do the same come November after both have been in season. I would expect the '00's to be better conditioned given the 16 straight days of 100-degree heat they have been playing or practicing in. That will take a bite into the size/speed advantage the extra year gives the '99's.
    nah there is gonna be more to this story? they beat SR(mid D1) team but can't beat ASG(bottom D2)team and please don't tell the goalie had everything to do with it!

    finish1

    Posts: 1324
    Join date: 2009-12-03
    Location: In the net

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  finish1 on Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:18 pm

    omega striker wrote:
    Middie 07 wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    forbin wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?


    Did SR lose a lot of good players in June?
    quite a few "skilled" players but picked up some taller faster players so...... not to sure what happened myself?


    Something to consider ... the '00 teams have been playing a lot of intense soccer the past two months getting ready for QT & then the QT itself. Compared to this the '99 teams have had the summer off. My son's '00 has also been beating/playing level w/ a classic '99 team on a regular basis but I would not put much stock in it until they do the same come November after both have been in season. I would expect the '00's to be better conditioned given the 16 straight days of 100-degree heat they have been playing or practicing in. That will take a bite into the size/speed advantage the extra year gives the '99's.
    nah there is gonna be more to this story? they beat SR(mid D1) team but can't beat ASG(bottom D2)team and please don't tell the goalie had everything to do with it!


    Give credit to Alfonse, he is a great game coach. I was wrong to doubt him and was maybe too generous with the SR prediction...

    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Guest on Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:24 pm

    theres nothing more to this they beat a good solar team, tied a very good edmond ofc team (check their got sport ranking and history), then probably just got the grunt of an ASG team that probably was more motivated not to lose to a bunch 00's, seriously what other teams have you seen play up in a gold division in a tourney and do as good as them, and the bs about the 99s have been off all summer, pleeeeeeaaaaassssee

    omega striker

    Posts: 1848
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  omega striker on Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:41 pm

    finish1 wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Middie 07 wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    forbin wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar
    something is wrong here? they beat SR which is the #5 ranked D1 team and then lose to ASG which is like a 6 or 7th ranked D2 team?


    Did SR lose a lot of good players in June?
    quite a few "skilled" players but picked up some taller faster players so...... not to sure what happened myself?


    Something to consider ... the '00 teams have been playing a lot of intense soccer the past two months getting ready for QT & then the QT itself. Compared to this the '99 teams have had the summer off. My son's '00 has also been beating/playing level w/ a classic '99 team on a regular basis but I would not put much stock in it until they do the same come November after both have been in season. I would expect the '00's to be better conditioned given the 16 straight days of 100-degree heat they have been playing or practicing in. That will take a bite into the size/speed advantage the extra year gives the '99's.
    nah there is gonna be more to this story? they beat SR(mid D1) team but can't beat ASG(bottom D2)team and please don't tell the goalie had everything to do with it!


    Give credit to Alfonse, he is a great game coach. I was wrong to doubt him and was maybe too generous with the SR prediction...
    yea i'll agree great coach not a great magician who can just create talented players

    Amidoinitrite?

    Posts: 50
    Join date: 2010-06-23

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Amidoinitrite? on Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:23 pm

    ALL this talk about Texans gALL, maybe we shouldn't even play Classic this season at ALL!! Lol:)) Sleep

    forbin

    Posts: 222
    Join date: 2009-09-29

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  forbin on Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:37 pm

    So did Gall actually develop this team?

    off_the_woodwork

    Posts: 149
    Join date: 2010-07-27

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  off_the_woodwork on Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:11 am

    Middie 07 wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar

    I'll take a shot - DT Red - Craft will eventually be the better team.

    Wow, that is quite a shot. When you say eventually do you mean by U-19, or sooner? That's alright though because off-the-wall stuff like that is what makes this board so entertaining, so please keep it coming!! In the meanwhile DT Red - Craft probably should worry about the 4 - 5 teams which could knock them out of that 10th spot for next season and not so much about overtaking Gall LOL

    Middie 07

    Posts: 72
    Join date: 2010-07-19

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Middie 07 on Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:27 pm

    off_the_woodwork wrote:
    Middie 07 wrote:
    mcc78 wrote:anyone wanna reconsider the #1 after DT Galls performance in the Oklahoma Tourney in the 99 Gold division. These guys look like the real deal. They tied first game , second game they beat Solar 99 2-1, they should have no problem beating ASG 99 seeing they lost to Solar

    I'll take a shot - DT Red - Craft will eventually be the better team.

    Wow, that is quite a shot. When you say eventually do you mean by U-19, or sooner? That's alright though because off-the-wall stuff like that is what makes this board so entertaining, so please keep it coming!! In the meanwhile DT Red - Craft probably should worry about the 4 - 5 teams which could knock them out of that 10th spot for next season and not so much about overtaking Gall LOL

    Spinning up Texans fans is like going big game hunting at the zoo... Here's my reasoning - these are 10-11 year olds whose skill level will change dramatically over the next 4 years. Craft has 3 other teams, Gall none in the boys division. Craft's 3 other teams are all Div I and 1st, 2nd & 5th place in their age brackets. Craft simply has a better coaching resume than Gall and is also coaching the Red team (which always gets what it wants for players). Unless Gall is tasked w/ developing the next academy team, TX Red will eventually win out.

    omega striker

    Posts: 1848
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  omega striker on Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:35 pm

    forbin wrote:So did Gall actually develop this team?
    i thought polmykal did? confused

    midfield

    Posts: 2
    Join date: 2010-07-18

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  midfield on Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:28 pm

    This Gall team IS good and has been for a long time before he came along. They will continue to be good. If the parents don't believe Gall can do the job, then either he will be gone or they will leave.

    forbin

    Posts: 222
    Join date: 2009-09-29

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  forbin on Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:57 pm

    omega striker wrote:
    forbin wrote:So did Gall actually develop this team?
    i thought polmykal did? confused



    I heard it was ML.

    Rightback

    Posts: 118
    Join date: 2010-02-08

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Rightback on Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:58 pm

    midfield wrote:This Gall team IS good and has been for a long time before he came along. They will continue to be good. If the parents don't believe Gall can do the job, then either he will be gone or they will leave.


    With no offense to the coaches reading this, it ain't rocket science. Barry Switzer used to say that "the better my players are, the better my coaching gets". If you have the talent then coaching a team like this to success is not exactly splitting the atom.

    soccer23

    Posts: 303
    Join date: 2010-08-09

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  soccer23 on Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:24 pm

    Looking at schedule it looks like, regardless of whether these are "rankings" or not, 1 v. 20, 2 v. 19, 3 v. 18 etc.

    Anyone know what Week 2 has in store? 1 v. 2 (FCD Premier v. DT Gall)? Or does the top 10 get an easy head start with 1 v. 19, 1 v. 18, 1 v. 17 etc.? Could make for a season ending showdown between Premier and Gall in Week 19.

    afrankw

    Posts: 362
    Join date: 2009-06-28
    Age: 50

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  afrankw on Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:29 pm

    soccer23 wrote:Looking at schedule it looks like, regardless of whether these are "rankings" or not, 1 v. 20, 2 v. 19, 3 v. 18 etc.

    Anyone know what Week 2 has in store? 1 v. 2 (FCD Premier v. DT Gall)? Or does the top 10 get an easy head start with 1 v. 19, 1 v. 18, 1 v. 17 etc.? Could make for a season ending showdown between Premier and Gall in Week 19.


    Last year the top 10 played the 11 - 20 in the fall and then the top 10 played each other in the spring

    Middie 07

    Posts: 72
    Join date: 2010-07-19

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Middie 07 on Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:11 pm

    afrankw wrote:
    soccer23 wrote:Looking at schedule it looks like, regardless of whether these are "rankings" or not, 1 v. 20, 2 v. 19, 3 v. 18 etc.

    Anyone know what Week 2 has in store? 1 v. 2 (FCD Premier v. DT Gall)? Or does the top 10 get an easy head start with 1 v. 19, 1 v. 18, 1 v. 17 etc.? Could make for a season ending showdown between Premier and Gall in Week 19.


    Last year the top 10 played the 11 - 20 in the fall and then the top 10 played each other in the spring


    Well if you couple what I read in the run-up to the QT about how none of the 2nd tier teams should beat a top ten team and that schedule, the standings could look pretty interesting. 10 undefeated teams tied for 1st place and 10 winless teams tied for 11th! God help the team that breaks ranks - what a feeding frenzy that will make on this blog. By the way, is that how last Fall worked out?

    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  Guest on Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:25 pm

    If you look at the schedules for the top10 they were all over the board, it was not even close to the top10 playing the bottom10 in the Fall and then each other in the spring.

    afrankw

    Posts: 362
    Join date: 2009-06-28
    Age: 50

    Re: Classic League Pre-Season Rankings '00

    Post  afrankw on Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:45 pm

    whatthe wrote:If you look at the schedules for the top10 they were all over the board, it was not even close to the top10 playing the bottom10 in the Fall and then each other in the spring.


    Sorry you are correct. If you look at the top three teams they played 7 or 8 games against the bottom 10.

      Current date/time is Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:23 pm