TEXAS BOYS SOCCER FORUM

CHECK OUT THE NEW TXSOCCER GROUP ON FACEBOOK....come join now!
Visit the Girls Forum at:   www.txsoccer.net
** PLEASE START NEW THREADS WITH AGE GROUP **

Top posters

omega striker (2075)
 
go99 (2013)
 
finish1 (1430)
 
Axxman (982)
 
my2cents (816)
 
The German (815)
 
Ibystander (766)
 
plantit (687)
 
soccerrus2 (647)
 
gababa (572)
 

May 2012

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Calendar Calendar

Rss feeds

Yahoo! 
Google Reader 
MSN 
AOL 
NewsGator 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 

    Packs

    Share

    soccertimes3

    Posts: 17
    Join date: 2010-10-31

    Packs

    Post  soccertimes3 on Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:31 pm

    Ok, so taken from the Solar thread...there are packs.

    My view of packs (not that it is worth anything other than my view

    D1: Top 3 teams as ranked, then 4-6 or 7 then 7-10

    D2: Top 2 teams as ranked **but these could compete with D1 bottom pack** then you have middle 3-5. Then the bottom pack of 6-10.

    D3: I will not give opinion... not that experienced with the teams. **I would suspect the top of D3 could compete with bottom of D2 pretty well**


    Thoughts?

    Yak Attack

    Posts: 190
    Join date: 2010-05-29
    Location: NTX

    Re: Packs

    Post  Yak Attack on Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:54 pm

    Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).

    plantit

    Posts: 687
    Join date: 2009-06-30
    Location: under the bleechers seeing more butts

    Re: Packs

    Post  plantit on Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:51 am

    soccertimes3 wrote:Ok, so taken from the Solar thread...there are packs.

    My view of packs (not that it is worth anything other than my view

    D1: Top 3 teams as ranked, then 4-6 or 7 then 7-10

    D2: Top 2 teams as ranked **but these could compete with D1 bottom pack** then you have middle 3-5. Then the bottom pack of 6-10.

    D3: I will not give opinion... not that experienced with the teams. **I would suspect the top of D3 could compete with bottom of D2 pretty well**


    Thoughts?


    Yah! Until the top teams can beat the bottom on a consistant bases by, Ahh.. lets say 4-5 goals . Then most games boil down to a mistake, ( by a 12 year old ). Agreed that the top 3 are a little more consistant but by no means dominating . The seperation may become more evident in the older age brackets . Keep in mind their shooting on an 8ft goal with a 4 ft keeper . So good teams can win or lose with 1 crazy ass shot. Bottom this, top that if the kids havin fun enjoy! cheers

    soccerrus2

    Posts: 647
    Join date: 2009-06-22

    Re: Packs

    Post  soccerrus2 on Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:25 am

    I hope your intent isn't to change the divisions in Classic? It's a mute point when you get to academy age anyway.

    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Packs

    Post  happyfeet on Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:52 am

    soccerrus2 wrote:I hope your intent isn't to change the divisions in Classic? It's a mute point when you get to academy age anyway.


    It's a silent point?? I think it's probably a moot point. Very Happy

    RatFink

    Posts: 43
    Join date: 2010-10-13

    Re: Packs

    Post  RatFink on Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:04 am

    It was a subconscious error made by soc2. He really meant to say that know it all Plantit should remain mute. You can tell what part of the pack his bb is in simply by his comments.

    finish1

    Posts: 1430
    Join date: 2009-12-03
    Location: In the net

    Re: Packs

    Post  finish1 on Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:12 am

    SR2 as a mute? Nice thought. Deaf, dumb and blind can't be far away...wait, he is a ref. affraid

    plantit

    Posts: 687
    Join date: 2009-06-30
    Location: under the bleechers seeing more butts

    Re: Packs

    Post  plantit on Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:19 am

    RatFink wrote:It was a subconscious error made by soc2. He really meant to say that know it all Plantit should remain mute. You can tell what part of the pack his bb is in simply by his comments.


    Boy! you were right . We were dismantled and dominated on a weekly basis according to the c/l website. The facts are the facts, in fact i'm going to recommend that we move to another division right now because we just don't stand a chance. Top 3 teams are a combined + 1 in three games against us , with only 1 being a loss. "disgraceful" . That my friend is a hurdel that mere mortals just cannot overcome. I'm really in favor of the top 3 just creating their own league . It's just not fair.

    RatFink

    Posts: 43
    Join date: 2010-10-13

    Re: Packs

    Post  RatFink on Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:13 pm

    Give it a little time, the goals will come, and clearly not from your team. Your coach may be good at scouting and preventing goals right now, but eventually you will have to score goals if you want to stay in D1. No need to make recommendation just yet, that will happen on its own soon enough unless some major changes are made to your structure. But again no need to worry on that one cause that is already in the works.

    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Packs

    Post  Guest on Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:50 pm

    What is already in the works? A coaching change? Tell us, Rat, what you know from scurrying around?

    omega striker

    Posts: 2075
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  omega striker on Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:52 pm

    whyme wrote:What is already in the works? A coaching change? Tell us, Rat, what you know from scurrying around?
    subscribing Suspect

    plantit

    Posts: 687
    Join date: 2009-06-30
    Location: under the bleechers seeing more butts

    Re: Packs

    Post  plantit on Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:54 pm

    RatFink wrote:Give it a little time, the goals will come, and clearly not from your team. Your coach may be good at scouting and preventing goals right now, but eventually you will have to score goals if you want to stay in D1. No need to make recommendation just yet, that will happen on its own soon enough unless some major changes are made to your structure. But again no need to worry on that one cause that is already in the works.



    AHH.. You know sooo much ! Can I come play with ur tinker toys. will you teach me ? Please, oh pretty please...


    Old news Rat dung.



    Pinknupe

    Posts: 89
    Join date: 2010-03-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  Pinknupe on Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:43 pm

    Yo so funie

    Texas FC

    Posts: 41
    Join date: 2009-07-27
    Age: 39
    Location: Plano

    Re: Packs

    Post  Texas FC on Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:58 am

    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball

    omega striker

    Posts: 2075
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  omega striker on Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:54 pm

    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch

    Texas FC

    Posts: 41
    Join date: 2009-07-27
    Age: 39
    Location: Plano

    Re: Packs

    Post  Texas FC on Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:18 pm

    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.

    omega striker

    Posts: 2075
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  omega striker on Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:49 pm

    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.
    thats cool but you still have to play the 2 top PPL teams to get in? good luck either way! Cool

    Texas FC

    Posts: 41
    Join date: 2009-07-27
    Age: 39
    Location: Plano

    Re: Packs

    Post  Texas FC on Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:48 am

    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.
    thats cool but you still have to play the 2 top PPL teams to get in? good luck either way! Cool
    I like their chances but they still have to get there and win. That is what makes it fun.

    finish1

    Posts: 1430
    Join date: 2009-12-03
    Location: In the net

    Re: Packs

    Post  finish1 on Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:14 am

    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.
    thats cool but you still have to play the 2 top PPL teams to get in? good luck either way! Cool
    I like their chances but they still have to get there and win. That is what makes it fun.



    I took a quick look at the Arlington standings. No team is running away from the API pack at mid point. The top of the group is split between Aztecas and FWU. In their first two meetings, FWU won the first match and they tied the second.


    In the PPL pack, DI has an undefeated team as the TFC 99 boys are 9-0. The DII group also has a 9-0 team in Liverpool 99.

    omega striker

    Posts: 2075
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  omega striker on Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:20 am

    finish1 wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.
    thats cool but you still have to play the 2 top PPL teams to get in? good luck either way! Cool
    I like their chances but they still have to get there and win. That is what makes it fun.



    I took a quick look at the Arlington standings. No team is running away from the API pack at mid point. The top of the group is split between Aztecas and FWU. In their first two meetings, FWU won the first match and they tied the second.


    In the PPL pack, DI has an undefeated team as the TFC 99 boys are 9-0. The DII group also has a 9-0 team in Liverpool 99.
    don't forget about the FC Toros in PPL, and it is general thinking that the PPL teams are stronger then the APL teams! good luck to all those teams regardless! Cool

    soccerfly

    Posts: 17
    Join date: 2010-05-05

    Re: Packs

    Post  soccerfly on Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:19 pm

    finish1 wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.
    thats cool but you still have to play the 2 top PPL teams to get in? good luck either way! Cool
    I like their chances but they still have to get there and win. That is what makes it fun.



    I took a quick look at the Arlington standings. No team is running away from the API pack at mid point. The top of the group is split between Aztecas and FWU. In their first two meetings, FWU won the first match and they tied the second.


    In the PPL pack, DI has an undefeated team as the TFC 99 boys are 9-0. The DII group also has a 9-0 team in Liverpool 99.
    The boys have faired extremley well in all tournaments. I think they have a good chance as well.

    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Packs

    Post  wareagle on Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:56 am

    soccerfly wrote:
    finish1 wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    omega striker wrote:
    Texas FC wrote:
    Yak Attack wrote:Same as it always was:

    Divide D1 into 2 groups: Pack 1 = 1-3/4, Pack 2 = 4/5-8

    Then Pack 3 = remaining D1 and most of D2, the Pack 4 = remaining D2 and D3.

    4 Packs should do it for Classic...

    Oh and yes, the top of PPL can keep up with anything in Pack 4 (no clue about APL).


    The top of Arlington can play with the fourth pack and would challenge the third pack. Basketball
    so why are they still in APL? scratch
    Line up changes were significant and they shouldn't be there much longer.
    thats cool but you still have to play the 2 top PPL teams to get in? good luck either way! Cool
    I like their chances but they still have to get there and win. That is what makes it fun.



    I took a quick look at the Arlington standings. No team is running away from the API pack at mid point. The top of the group is split between Aztecas and FWU. In their first two meetings, FWU won the first match and they tied the second.


    In the PPL pack, DI has an undefeated team as the TFC 99 boys are 9-0. The DII group also has a 9-0 team in Liverpool 99.
    The boys have faired extremley well in all tournaments. I think they have a good chance as well.
    Looks to me like the three teams in Arlington continue to beat up on each other. Who wins in the end? Texas Lightning, Fort Worth United or the Aztecas?

    Seinfeld4

    Posts: 378
    Join date: 2009-06-23
    Location: Starting......NOW

    Re: Packs

    Post  Seinfeld4 on Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:07 am

    Looks like an exciting race to the finish for those three teams.

    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Packs

    Post  wareagle on Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:09 pm

    Seinfeld4 wrote:Looks like an exciting race to the finish for those three teams.
    I think they could play with any of the teams in "group 4".

    Seinfeld4

    Posts: 378
    Join date: 2009-06-23
    Location: Starting......NOW

    Re: Packs

    Post  Seinfeld4 on Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:10 pm

    Looking at their GotSoccer results against classic league teams I would tend to agree.

    omega striker

    Posts: 2075
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  omega striker on Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:53 pm

    Seinfeld4 wrote:Looking at their GotSoccer results against classic league teams I would tend to agree.
    so what does their gotsoccer results lead you to believe? scratch

    Seinfeld4

    Posts: 378
    Join date: 2009-06-23
    Location: Starting......NOW

    Re: Packs

    Post  Seinfeld4 on Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:59 pm

    They beat some clsssic league teams, tied and lost to some. They were never blown out by any of them. Would lead me to believe on any given day they could compete with the group he identified.

    Do you disagree?

    finish1

    Posts: 1430
    Join date: 2009-12-03
    Location: In the net

    Re: Packs

    Post  finish1 on Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:09 pm

    Is it possible to go from Arlington D1 to Classic D3 during the seeding tournaments this Spring?

    omega striker

    Posts: 2075
    Join date: 2009-07-02

    Re: Packs

    Post  omega striker on Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:39 pm

    Seinfeld4 wrote:They beat some clsssic league teams, tied and lost to some. They were never blown out by any of them. Would lead me to believe on any given day they could compete with the group he identified.

    Do you disagree?
    I haven't really seen too many of these games but the few I have seen were more defensive line ups from the API and PPL teams so yes the score will be low! but heres something to take note ALL classic league teams change their line ups every season sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse and what I have witnessed is that team coming from API or PPL are teams that have the same bunch thru academy that got crushed by ALL classice league teams back then so what has happened is they have learned to play better as a team unlike the revolving door known as a classic league soccer! good example United was dominant in PPL and is doing very well in D3 and are one of my picks to fininsh in the top 2 spots,now they don't have not one superstar on that team(no go to player) just a team that has been together for years and knows each other well! Regardless good luck!!!

    now my view on the teams to be relegated from D3... FCD Black who not only to this point has yet to win they have yet to score although they don't belong in classic league(gift from the by the folding of FCD Blue) they do move the ball around quite nicely and the DTRS squad can play and beat anybody out there but the lack of team unity hurts them the most the battle for 9th spot is between them and Tejanos tongue

    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Packs

    Post  wareagle on Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:26 pm

    omega striker wrote:
    Seinfeld4 wrote:They beat some clsssic league teams, tied and lost to some. They were never blown out by any of them. Would lead me to believe on any given day they could compete with the group he identified.

    Do you disagree?
    I haven't really seen too many of these games but the few I have seen were more defensive line ups from the API and PPL teams so yes the score will be low! but heres something to take note ALL classic league teams change their line ups every season sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse and what I have witnessed is that team coming from API or PPL are teams that have the same bunch thru academy that got crushed by ALL classice league teams back then so what has happened is they have learned to play better as a team unlike the revolving door known as a classic league soccer! good example United was dominant in PPL and is doing very well in D3 and are one of my picks to fininsh in the top 2 spots,now they don't have not one superstar on that team(no go to player) just a team that has been together for years and knows each other well! Regardless good luck!!!

    now my view on the teams to be relegated from D3... FCD Black who not only to this point has yet to win they have yet to score although they don't belong in classic league(gift from the by the folding of FCD Blue) they do move the ball around quite nicely and the DTRS squad can play and beat anybody out there but the lack of team unity hurts them the most the battle for 9th spot is between them and Tejanos tongue
    Hmmm, I would disagree with the APL teams being the same kids but just getting better. FWU has at least 8 new players this year and TXL may have that many as well. I would say both of those teams have improved based on kids switching teams; just like the classic league teams you mentioned.

    I agree that they are good defensively but according to gotsoccer FWU has put the ball in the net 61 times in just 17 games; to me that means they know how to score as well. Of course, that could be attributed to the competition they play week in and week out. I am surprised they haven't played in any tournaments this year. It looks like TXL fits your defensive description; they have only scored 54 goals in 30 games. Razz

      Current date/time is Thu May 24, 2012 4:33 am