TEXAS BOYS SOCCER FORUM
| omega striker (2075) |
| |||
| go99 (2013) |
| |||
| finish1 (1430) |
| |||
| Axxman (982) |
| |||
| my2cents (816) |
| |||
| The German (815) |
| |||
| Ibystander (766) |
| |||
| plantit (687) |
| |||
| soccerrus2 (647) |
| |||
| gababa (572) |
|
plantit wrote:soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
Bend over .. Remove stick now... Anytime!
FCdad wrote:soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
Get real dude. If you think someone would really get sued for that, you don't know much about the law.
It was a joke. You must either be a Texans or an Andromeda parent without a sense of humor.
bunited wrote:Solar and TFC use primarily church-owned land, in addition to some city fields. While Liverpool does have some practice locations acquired through these means, the owner of Liverpool also owns all three Blue Sky facilities, thereby giving Liverpool teams indoor and outdoor options in 3 different cities, making them the only club of the three with their "own fields." The merger with Club Classic last year also netted them the Plano Y fields, but these are in use also under a longterm contract with the owner of that land, not owned by Liverpool.
soccergrinder wrote:FCdad wrote:soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
Get real dude. If you think someone would really get sued for that, you don't know much about the law.
It was a joke. You must either be a Texans or an Andromeda parent without a sense of humor.
Actually, I have been in the communication design field for 30+ years and know a lot about copyright law. I have testfied as an expert in copyright cases. So I know exactly what I am talking about. You steal somones logo and use it is against the law, no if ands or buts. Illegaly acting like you are a representative of the Texans orginization is another. This would be a real easy case to prove. Even this thread could be used to prove the point as the response from several readers thought it was real. And I didn't say they would, I said they could.
soccerrus2 wrote:soccergrinder wrote:FCdad wrote:soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
Get real dude. If you think someone would really get sued for that, you don't know much about the law.
It was a joke. You must either be a Texans or an Andromeda parent without a sense of humor.
Actually, I have been in the communication design field for 30+ years and know a lot about copyright law. I have testfied as an expert in copyright cases. So I know exactly what I am talking about. You steal somones logo and use it is against the law, no if ands or buts. Illegaly acting like you are a representative of the Texans orginization is another. This would be a real easy case to prove. Even this thread could be used to prove the point as the response from several readers thought it was real. And I didn't say they would, I said they could.
Settle down grinder....
finish1 wrote:soccerrus2 wrote:soccergrinder wrote:FCdad wrote:soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
Get real dude. If you think someone would really get sued for that, you don't know much about the law.
It was a joke. You must either be a Texans or an Andromeda parent without a sense of humor.
Actually, I have been in the communication design field for 30+ years and know a lot about copyright law. I have testfied as an expert in copyright cases. So I know exactly what I am talking about. You steal somones logo and use it is against the law, no if ands or buts. Illegaly acting like you are a representative of the Texans orginization is another. This would be a real easy case to prove. Even this thread could be used to prove the point as the response from several readers thought it was real. And I didn't say they would, I said they could.
Settle down grinder....
Your'e not a ref on here, SR2. Grinder is technically correct, but I believe the intent of the original post was a spoof.
soccerrus2 wrote:bunited wrote:Solar and TFC use primarily church-owned land, in addition to some city fields. While Liverpool does have some practice locations acquired through these means, the owner of Liverpool also owns all three Blue Sky facilities, thereby giving Liverpool teams indoor and outdoor options in 3 different cities, making them the only club of the three with their "own fields." The merger with Club Classic last year also netted them the Plano Y fields, but these are in use also under a longterm contract with the owner of that land, not owned by Liverpool.
Yeah but you still have to play for Liverpool.
soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
You steal somones logo and use it is against the law, no if ands or buts. Illegaly acting like you are a representative of the Texans orginization is another.
This is almost funnier than the fake announcement.soccerrus2 wrote:finish1 wrote:soccerrus2 wrote:soccergrinder wrote:FCdad wrote:soccergrinder wrote:Wow. Dude. You just broke at least one federal law (copyright) and probably a trademark law as well. Much less defamation. And possibly have opened yourself and this forum up for a lawsuit. Real smart.
Get real dude. If you think someone would really get sued for that, you don't know much about the law.
It was a joke. You must either be a Texans or an Andromeda parent without a sense of humor.
Actually, I have been in the communication design field for 30+ years and know a lot about copyright law. I have testfied as an expert in copyright cases. So I know exactly what I am talking about. You steal somones logo and use it is against the law, no if ands or buts. Illegaly acting like you are a representative of the Texans orginization is another. This would be a real easy case to prove. Even this thread could be used to prove the point as the response from several readers thought it was real. And I didn't say they would, I said they could.
Settle down grinder....
Your'e not a ref on here, SR2. Grinder is technically correct, but I believe the intent of the original post was a spoof.
And you are not the moderator...please, it was a joke on a soccer forum! Bringing trademarks, lawsuits and defamation is just silly.
DownTown21 wrote:Why, why, why the law suits.....this post was funny...
Great to see all the upset parents from Liverpool and Solar teams sat up for there clubs.
This reminds me of the movie TRADING PLACES.
Someone won a bet of one dollar.
clueless wrote:DownTown21 wrote:Why, why, why the law suits.....this post was funny...
Great to see all the upset parents from Liverpool and Solar teams sat up for there clubs.
This reminds me of the movie TRADING PLACES.
Someone won a bet of one dollar.
As a Liverpool parent, I am loving life at that club. Well run, fun city, great programs/events, facilities, uniforms, coaches...cost is lower than most (pretty equivalent). I honestly have zero complaints about it and have to laugh at those who fail to see it. As with the majority of the NTX soccer world, past national championships are of no use to myself nor my children. Fun being under the radar there, for certain.
A welcome contrast to the Andro situation for me.
TheFarPost wrote:I have not been around Classic League for a few years now.
But please correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked at the Classic League Division 1 standings for all Age groups and
did not see one LIVERPOOL CLUB TEAM in the Standings at all!
Let me know exactly what your laughing at.
over the years several clubs rise to the top and fall. If you are around long enough you will see what I mean
It used to be Longhorns,Comets
Then Solar ,Texans, Inter, DFW Tejanos.Andromeda
Then FC Dallas after they raided Inter and began MLS are strong
Texans have kept up and adjusted to the change.
Solar fell hard last year
Tejanos are barely there
Longhorns have crumbled
Andromeda is crumbling
The right Coach is more important than the club. And each club has some good coaches
TheFarPost wrote:I have not been around Classic League for a few years now.
But please correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked at the Classic League Division 1 standings for all Age groups and
did not see one LIVERPOOL CLUB TEAM in the Standings at all!
Let me know exactly what your laughing at.
over the years several clubs rise to the top and fall. If you are around long enough you will see what I mean
It used to be Longhorns,Comets
Then Solar ,Texans, Inter, DFW Tejanos.Andromeda
Then FC Dallas after they raided Inter and began MLS are strong
Texans have kept up and adjusted to the change.
Solar fell hard last year
Tejanos are barely there
Longhorns have crumbled
Andromeda is crumbling
The right Coach is more important than the club. And each club has some good coaches
TheFarPost wrote:I have not been around Classic League for a few years now.
But please correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked at the Classic League Division 1 standings for all Age groups and
did not see one LIVERPOOL CLUB TEAM in the Standings at all!
Let me know exactly what your laughing at.
over the years several clubs rise to the top and fall. If you are around long enough you will see what I mean
It used to be Longhorns,Comets
Then Solar ,Texans, Inter, DFW Tejanos.Andromeda
Then FC Dallas after they raided Inter and began MLS are strong
Texans have kept up and adjusted to the change.
Solar fell hard last year
Tejanos are barely there
Longhorns have crumbled
Andromeda is crumbling
The right Coach is more important than the club. And each club has some good coaches
clueless wrote:TheFarPost wrote:I have not been around Classic League for a few years now.
But please correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked at the Classic League Division 1 standings for all Age groups and
did not see one LIVERPOOL CLUB TEAM in the Standings at all!
Let me know exactly what your laughing at.
over the years several clubs rise to the top and fall. If you are around long enough you will see what I mean
It used to be Longhorns,Comets
Then Solar ,Texans, Inter, DFW Tejanos.Andromeda
Then FC Dallas after they raided Inter and began MLS are strong
Texans have kept up and adjusted to the change.
Solar fell hard last year
Tejanos are barely there
Longhorns have crumbled
Andromeda is crumbling
The right Coach is more important than the club. And each club has some good coaches
Well, in my particular case, my daughter's D1 team was only 17-0-2 this year, but, again, I don't really care about that - it's the whole package, not the championships or wins (they are nice, but not what's utmost important).
Liverpool has only existed for 3 years, they are building up their coaching, which will, hopefully, build up their reputation and standings. I don't know anyone who is stating they are one of the winningest clubs around, only a great club on the way to being greater.
In fact, the girl's equivalent of DA is ECNL - Liverpool can't even entertain joining a club-based league such as that given no history. If that's what floats people's boat as far as ripping on a club, go for it - it's all true.
There are far more teams on FCD/Texans/Andro/Solar than their top ones.
Big Swoosh wrote:clueless wrote:TheFarPost wrote:I have not been around Classic League for a few years now.
But please correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked at the Classic League Division 1 standings for all Age groups and
did not see one LIVERPOOL CLUB TEAM in the Standings at all!
Let me know exactly what your laughing at.
over the years several clubs rise to the top and fall. If you are around long enough you will see what I mean
It used to be Longhorns,Comets
Then Solar ,Texans, Inter, DFW Tejanos.Andromeda
Then FC Dallas after they raided Inter and began MLS are strong
Texans have kept up and adjusted to the change.
Solar fell hard last year
Tejanos are barely there
Longhorns have crumbled
Andromeda is crumbling
The right Coach is more important than the club. And each club has some good coaches
Well, in my particular case, my daughter's D1 team was only 17-0-2 this year, but, again, I don't really care about that - it's the whole package, not the championships or wins (they are nice, but not what's utmost important).
Liverpool has only existed for 3 years, they are building up their coaching, which will, hopefully, build up their reputation and standings. I don't know anyone who is stating they are one of the winningest clubs around, only a great club on the way to being greater.
In fact, the girl's equivalent of DA is ECNL - Liverpool can't even entertain joining a club-based league such as that given no history. If that's what floats people's boat as far as ripping on a club, go for it - it's all true.
There are far more teams on FCD/Texans/Andro/Solar than their top ones.
Clue...I do believe you had a son that played on the Andro National Championship Team.
