TEXAS BOYS SOCCER FORUM

CHECK OUT THE NEW TXSOCCER GROUP ON FACEBOOK....come join now!
Visit the Girls Forum at:   www.txsoccer.net
** PLEASE START NEW THREADS WITH AGE GROUP **

Top posters

omega striker (2076)
 
go99 (2016)
 
finish1 (1434)
 
Axxman (983)
 
my2cents (816)
 
The German (815)
 
Ibystander (766)
 
plantit (687)
 
soccerrus2 (647)
 
gababa (572)
 

May 2012

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Calendar Calendar

Rss feeds

Yahoo! 
Google Reader 
MSN 
AOL 
NewsGator 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 

    Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Share

    ntxsoccerchat

    Posts: 34
    Join date: 2009-07-05

    Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ntxsoccerchat on Wed May 18, 2011 11:31 am

    Please correct me if any of this is wrong.

    DA is at 16 and 18. Ran by USSF.

    Pre-Academy is now at 13, 14 and 15. Ran by US Club Soccer.

    Do Pre-Academy teams play in separate Pre-Academy League? (As in no longer in CL)?

    If so, has CL decided what to do with slots of teams that move to Pre-Academy? And if they haven't what are they waiting for?

    What will happen to pre Pre-Academy teams? (ie 11 and 12 top teams from Pre-Academy clubs)? They play 2 years in CL and then bolt? Will CL let those Pre-Academy clubs keep byes in their league going into 13 even though their league is no longer "competitive" enough for those clubs top players/teams?

    I'm sure I have other questions but the last sentence took a bit out of me.

    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  happyfeet on Wed May 18, 2011 12:06 pm

    ntxsoccerchat wrote:Please correct me if any of this is wrong.

    DA is at 16 and 18. Ran by USSF.

    Pre-Academy is now at 13, 14 and 15. Ran by US Club Soccer.

    Do Pre-Academy teams play in separate Pre-Academy League? (As in no longer in CL)Yes

    If so, has CL decided what to do with slots of teams that move to Pre-Academy? And if they haven't what are they waiting for? Next board meeting

    What will happen to pre Pre-Academy teams? (ie 11 and 12 top teams from Pre-Academy clubs)? They play 2 years in CL and then bolt? Will CL let those Pre-Academy clubs keep byes in their league going into 13 even though their league is no longer "competitive" enough for those clubs top players/teams? Although, the merits of this new league can be endlessly debated, the board will make a decision that it deems is in the best interest of the CL's longevity and competitiveness. There is no punishing clubs because they take this opportunity, nor is there any favoritism toward the larger clubs. Any allegations to the contrary show the naivete of how the league is run. Those on this forum who are vocal critics are certainly invited to volunteer their time versus complaining without having all of the knowledge needed to make an informed decision.

    I'm sure I have other questions but the last sentence took a bit out of me.

    tkhmoh

    Posts: 15
    Join date: 2010-06-21

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  tkhmoh on Wed May 18, 2011 12:16 pm

    When does the board meet next?

    Marmaduke

    Posts: 113
    Join date: 2009-07-24

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  Marmaduke on Wed May 18, 2011 12:19 pm

    The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Wed May 18, 2011 12:21 pm

    happyfeet wrote:
    ntxsoccerchat wrote:If so, has CL decided what to do with slots of teams that move to Pre-Academy? And if they haven't what are they waiting for? Next board meeting

    Although, the merits of this new league can be endlessly debated, the board will make a decision that it deems is in the best interest of the CL's longevity and competitiveness. There is no punishing clubs because they take this opportunity, nor is there any favoritism toward the larger clubs. Any allegations to the contrary show the naivete of how the league is run. Those on this forum who are vocal critics are certainly invited to volunteer their time versus complaining without having all of the knowledge needed to make an informed decision.

    Funny, I know a bunch of coaches that claim they already know exactly what is happening. I guess we'll just have to wait for June 1 for CCSAI to "announce" their decision. I'm putting my predictions in a sealed envelope . . .

    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  happyfeet on Wed May 18, 2011 1:11 pm

    Maybe I napped during that part of the meeting.
    It wouldn't surprise me if the board decided to remain consistent with how it was handled with DA.

    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  happyfeet on Wed May 18, 2011 1:14 pm

    Marmaduke wrote:The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    It would be very difficult (almost impossible) for a team to play both with two different definitions of age groups (school year for CL and calendar year for pre-academy).

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Wed May 18, 2011 2:10 pm

    happyfeet wrote:Maybe I napped during that part of the meeting.
    It wouldn't surprise me if the board decided to remain consistent with how it was handled with DA.
    Maybe it is just the coaches assuming that will be the case.
    Has the board ever looked at what happened to the teams created by the clubs from scratch to fill the spots below the team leaving for DA and how they have fared over time?

    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  happyfeet on Wed May 18, 2011 2:17 pm

    ball-coise is mhath wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:Maybe I napped during that part of the meeting.
    It wouldn't surprise me if the board decided to remain consistent with how it was handled with DA.
    Maybe it is just the coaches assuming that will be the case.
    Has the board ever looked at what happened to the teams created by the clubs from scratch to fill the spots below the team leaving for DA and how they have fared over time?

    No official look. I'm sure some of the commissioners have an idea in their age groups. I think it has been a mixed bag.

    soccergrinder

    Posts: 188
    Join date: 2010-04-10

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  soccergrinder on Wed May 18, 2011 2:21 pm

    happyfeet wrote:
    Marmaduke wrote:The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    It would be very difficult (almost impossible) for a team to play both with two different definitions of age groups (school year for CL and calendar year for pre-academy).



    You have been asleep. It is quite easy to figure out and the DA have been doing it since it's inception. You play in the division of your oldest player. Just like it states in the North Texas handbook. Just like the DA teams do in Disney and Dallas Cup.

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Wed May 18, 2011 2:23 pm

    happyfeet wrote:
    ball-coise is mhath wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:Maybe I napped during that part of the meeting.
    It wouldn't surprise me if the board decided to remain consistent with how it was handled with DA.
    Maybe it is just the coaches assuming that will be the case.
    Has the board ever looked at what happened to the teams created by the clubs from scratch to fill the spots below the team leaving for DA and how they have fared over time?

    No official look. I'm sure some of the commissioners have an idea in their age groups. I think it has been a mixed bag.

    That matches my impression in a couple age groups. And, there is no way to tell how teams sliding up a division if the byes were vacated would have fared either, though the assumption might logically be better on average since they already performed higher up in their respective divisions in most cases. I was just curious.

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Wed May 18, 2011 2:24 pm

    soccergrinder wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:
    Marmaduke wrote:The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    It would be very difficult (almost impossible) for a team to play both with two different definitions of age groups (school year for CL and calendar year for pre-academy).



    You have been asleep. It is quite easy to figure out and the DA have been doing it since it's inception. You play in the division of your oldest player. Just like it states in the North Texas handbook. Just like the DA teams do in Disney and Dallas Cup.

    Assuming there happens to be a bye in that older division they can just grab at will

    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  happyfeet on Wed May 18, 2011 2:38 pm

    soccergrinder wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:
    Marmaduke wrote:The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    It would be very difficult (almost impossible) for a team to play both with two different definitions of age groups (school year for CL and calendar year for pre-academy).


    You have been asleep. It is quite easy to figure out and the DA have been doing it since it's inception. You play in the division of your oldest player. Just like it states in the North Texas handbook. Just like the DA teams do in Disney and Dallas Cup.

    No DA teams play in the CL. If I didn't understand the question, my apologies.


    rqps

    Posts: 150
    Join date: 2009-07-20

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  rqps on Wed May 18, 2011 3:13 pm

    happyfeet wrote:
    soccergrinder wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:
    Marmaduke wrote:The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    It would be very difficult (almost impossible) for a team to play both with two different definitions of age groups (school year for CL and calendar year for pre-academy).


    You have been asleep. It is quite easy to figure out and the DA have been doing it since it's inception. You play in the division of your oldest player. Just like it states in the North Texas handbook. Just like the DA teams do in Disney and Dallas Cup.

    No DA teams play in the CL. If I didn't understand the question, my apologies.



    I am sure teams will not play in both but what about individual players? Will they be allowed to play with Pre-Academy and drop down to Classic and play with their clubs D1 team as well?

    socmom97

    Posts: 74
    Join date: 2010-07-20

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  socmom97 on Wed May 18, 2011 3:23 pm

    Board voted at the last meeting to keep things as is. The byes stay with the club unless 75% of the team goes somewhere else. I am not aware of any discussion for next months board meeting regarding pre-academy byes.

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Wed May 18, 2011 3:38 pm

    socmom97 wrote:Board voted at the last meeting to keep things as is. The byes stay with the club unless 75% of the team goes somewhere else. I am not aware of any discussion for next months board meeting regarding pre-academy byes.


    Teams leaving the league to go to Pre-Academy are teams with 75% and more going somewhere else--they can't take a CL bye to some different league.

    When DA came around, the board decided that for a team leaving the league to play in another league, the bye would stay with the club as long as it filled the roster of that leaving team's bye with N+1 players from within the club (I think as of April roster freeze date).

    If the board makes no change, then the byes for teams leaving the league for pre-academy are lost, and the rules for shifting up teams based on league play (and allowing more challenge teams in) apply.

    It would seem appropriate for the board to make some announcement of how byes for teams leaving for pre-academy will be treated before much of June open season is gone.


    happyfeet

    Posts: 396
    Join date: 2009-07-06

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  happyfeet on Wed May 18, 2011 3:39 pm

    I believe we voted to do nothing for now and would re-evaluate if needed.
    Everybody knows who I am on this forum(JP). If you are a board member, as well, we had a different understanding...but that wouldn't be the first time. Laughing

    futbolnutt

    Posts: 145
    Join date: 2009-06-21

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  futbolnutt on Wed May 18, 2011 3:41 pm

    rqps wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:
    soccergrinder wrote:
    happyfeet wrote:
    Marmaduke wrote:The word we received from CL was for the boys, the clubs do keep their bye if a team is playing in the Pre-Academy league. And it is also my understanding the teams can actually play both. On the girls side the girls teams do lose their bye if they go to the new ECNL league. So the two leagues are different on this issue.


    It would be very difficult (almost impossible) for a team to play both with two different definitions of age groups (school year for CL and calendar year for pre-academy).


    You have been asleep. It is quite easy to figure out and the DA have been doing it since it's inception. You play in the division of your oldest player. Just like it states in the North Texas handbook. Just like the DA teams do in Disney and Dallas Cup.

    No DA teams play in the CL. If I didn't understand the question, my apologies.



    I am sure teams will not play in both but what about individual players? Will they be allowed to play with Pre-Academy and drop down to Classic and play with their clubs D1 team as well?


    Depends if they have the same rules as Academy. If so, then full time (FT) academy players cannot play both. If they are development players (DP)then they are limited in the number of Academy games they can play. Again, I don't know if Pre-Academy is the same. I would hope so.

    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  wareagle on Fri May 20, 2011 11:52 am

    ball-coise is mhath wrote:
    socmom97 wrote:Board voted at the last meeting to keep things as is. The byes stay with the club unless 75% of the team goes somewhere else. I am not aware of any discussion for next months board meeting regarding pre-academy byes.


    Teams leaving the league to go to Pre-Academy are teams with 75% and more going somewhere else--they can't take a CL bye to some different league.

    When DA came around, the board decided that for a team leaving the league to play in another league, the bye would stay with the club as long as it filled the roster of that leaving team's bye with N+1 players from within the club (I think as of April roster freeze date).

    If the board makes no change, then the byes for teams leaving the league for pre-academy are lost, and the rules for shifting up teams based on league play (and allowing more challenge teams in) apply.

    It would seem appropriate for the board to make some announcement of how byes for teams leaving for pre-academy will be treated before much of June open season is gone.


    What is an N+1 player.


    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  wareagle on Fri May 20, 2011 11:54 am

    What is an N+1 player?

    finish1

    Posts: 1434
    Join date: 2009-12-03
    Location: In the net

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  finish1 on Fri May 20, 2011 12:02 pm

    wareagle wrote:What is an N+1 player?



    Your best friend when moving your team...

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Fri May 20, 2011 12:08 pm

    wareagle wrote:What is an N+1 player?

    Roster Size at freeze date/2=N

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Fri May 20, 2011 12:20 pm

    finish1 wrote:
    wareagle wrote:What is an N+1 player?
    Your best friend when moving your team...

    No, that would be the 75% player, unless you are a convincing type of Andro coach this year

    eagle

    Posts: 148
    Join date: 2009-06-24

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  eagle on Fri May 20, 2011 12:24 pm

    ball-coise is mhath wrote:
    wareagle wrote:What is an N+1 player?

    Roster Size at freeze date/2=N

    Rounded up. For example N for a roster of 17 would be 10.

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Fri May 20, 2011 12:31 pm

    eagle wrote:
    ball-coise is mhath wrote:
    wareagle wrote:What is an N+1 player?
    Roster Size at freeze date/2=N
    Rounded up. For example N for a roster of 17 would be 10.

    Right, fractional players not allowed! (but I think your math is maybe a bit off)

    For those relatively new to the game, this N+1 thing is a concept from many moons ago. Classic used to have a rule that for a club to keep a bye, the team accepting the bye for the new season had to have rostered N+1 number of players from the team that earned the bye. They did away with that and now the club keeps the bye no matter who is on the club's team accepting the bye. When DA came around, they probably realized wholesale teams leaving the league, but the club still getting the bye, would rock some folk's boats, so they resurrected the rule for the teams that left for DA in an attempt at appeasement(in a way that pretty much insured the clubs would still keep the bye anyway).

    THE NEEDLE

    Posts: 219
    Join date: 2009-08-20
    Location: Under skin

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  THE NEEDLE on Fri May 20, 2011 12:40 pm

    eagle wrote:
    ball-coise is mhath wrote:
    wareagle wrote:What is an N+1 player?

    Roster Size at freeze date/2=N

    Rounded up. For example N for a roster of 17 would be 10.


    Not quite. N=9 and N+1 = 10.

    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  wareagle on Fri May 20, 2011 2:21 pm

    Just trying to clarify but it was stated that the players must be on the "Clubs" roster. Do they have to be rostered to a particular team or just on a roster within the club? Embarassed

    wareagle

    Posts: 266
    Join date: 2010-04-05
    Location: Arguing both sides of the fence in every thread

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  wareagle on Fri May 20, 2011 2:24 pm

    Will CL be adding or inviting more teams, from Arlington and Plano, to the Ken Smith Qualifying Tournament in order to make up for the expected loss of teams?


    Looks like they already have: one TBA and the TXL 99Black



    Ken Smith Qualifying


    futbolnutt

    Posts: 145
    Join date: 2009-06-21

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  futbolnutt on Fri May 20, 2011 3:04 pm

    wareagle wrote:Just trying to clarify but it was stated that the players must be on the "Clubs" roster. Do they have to be rostered to a particular team or just on a roster within the club? Embarassed


    They have to be rostered on the Team.

    ball-coise is mhath

    Posts: 99
    Join date: 2009-08-13

    Re: Pre-Acadmey Clarification Please

    Post  ball-coise is mhath on Fri May 20, 2011 3:28 pm

    wareagle wrote:Just trying to clarify but it was stated that the players must be on the "Clubs" roster. Do they have to be rostered to a particular team or just on a roster within the club? Embarassed

    Two different rules. Kind of.

    For the 75% rule, for a team to move from one club to another and take the bye with them, 75% of the players from the "Team" have to move to the new club.

    When DA came around, they made a special rule and said for a "Club" to keep the bye they earned with a team that was leaving the league entirely, they had to fill the bye slot with N+1 players that were previously rostered with the "Club" (any team in the club) to keep the bye.

    In the case of andro coaches moving this year, they normaly would have to keep 75% of the Team roster to move the bye to a new club, but they softened that rule in this specific instance (for just some of the andro coaches) to N+1.

    As to your other question, this year is a bit uncertain. If teams move clubs within the league and fail to keep the 75% or N+1, as the case may be, number of players on the team, then the bye is lost if the club with the bye folds, or does not field a team for the spot, and teams shift up, including additional teams making the league from the play in if necessary.

    But, for teams vacating the league for pre-academy, things are a bit uncertain. One view is that since ccsai hasn't changed anything recently, unless ccsai specifically anounces an interpretation that differs, the current rules mean the club keeps those byes and can fill them with whoever they want--no N+1 or any other requirement. Another view would be that for the teams that leave the league entirely for pre-academy the bye goes away and teams shift up, unless ccsai announces a different interpretation.

    So far, ccsai has said nothing, though rumor has it the issue is up for consideration at their next board meeting June 1. If they say nothing changes, then I think the club keeps the bye however they can fill it. If they treat it like they did with DA and announce it will be N+1 from within the club, since you are only talking solar, fcd, and texans I think the bye effectively stays with the club. I would be surprised if any of those clubs lose any byes because of pre-academy.

      Current date/time is Thu May 24, 2012 3:01 pm