Not sure if this info was discussed earlier but I came across it and thought it was worth a look. A couple of things that jump out Txns have a pretty low 'style of play' and 'respect' grade, - and Andro has low scores for funding, and fields. All 3 Txn,Sol,Andro have the same grade for player development, Sol has the highest grade for style of play.

USSF Academy Evaluations:
Txns-FCD-Solar-Andro
Player Development 3-- 3-- 3-- 1
Style Of Play 2-- 4-- 3.5-- 1.5
Training Environment 3-- 3.5-- n/a-- 1
Administrative 3-- 5-- 2.5-- 2.5
Facilities 4.5-- 5-- 3-- 1
Funding 4-- 5-- 3-- 0
Respect 2.5-- 3.5-- 3.5-- 3

You can download the criteria for each category at:

http://www.ussoccer.com/Teams/Development-Academy/Academy-Overview.aspx