Search
Latest topics
» Coach Zeph Badii??
by oldcastle Today at 3:40 pm
» US National Team Roster
by Gatorz Today at 2:56 pm
» 99 Born Year Pre-Academy Tryouts
by indyfc Today at 2:52 pm
» Dallas Texans 01B North (Classic D3) is looking for players
by Chappie81 Today at 2:08 pm
» Brazil vs Mexico June 3rd 2012
by blarros Today at 12:57 pm
» MLS attendances
by blarros Today at 12:56 pm
» 96 Open Practive in Sachse/Rockwall/Rowlett/Garland/Wylie
by TSU Today at 11:43 am
» Odyssey 96 Boys Open Practice Schedule
by pitchbanditz Today at 11:37 am
» Solar Chelsea 99 Boys PRE ACADEMY Try Outs
by Solar96 Today at 11:17 am
» Solar Chelsea 97 Boys PRE ACADEMY Try Outs
by Solar96 Today at 11:16 am
» Solar Chelsea 00 Boys Tryouts
by Solar96 Today at 11:13 am
» MEMORIAL DAY 3 HOURS SKILLS CLINIC
by vernonhaynes Today at 11:07 am
» DA/PA tryouts
by Laimport Today at 10:39 am
» DT tryouts - questions for 01 parents
by Chappie81 Today at 10:25 am
» XTREME Camp June 11-14
by freebird Today at 1:04 am
by oldcastle Today at 3:40 pm
» US National Team Roster
by Gatorz Today at 2:56 pm
» 99 Born Year Pre-Academy Tryouts
by indyfc Today at 2:52 pm
» Dallas Texans 01B North (Classic D3) is looking for players
by Chappie81 Today at 2:08 pm
» Brazil vs Mexico June 3rd 2012
by blarros Today at 12:57 pm
» MLS attendances
by blarros Today at 12:56 pm
» 96 Open Practive in Sachse/Rockwall/Rowlett/Garland/Wylie
by TSU Today at 11:43 am
» Odyssey 96 Boys Open Practice Schedule
by pitchbanditz Today at 11:37 am
» Solar Chelsea 99 Boys PRE ACADEMY Try Outs
by Solar96 Today at 11:17 am
» Solar Chelsea 97 Boys PRE ACADEMY Try Outs
by Solar96 Today at 11:16 am
» Solar Chelsea 00 Boys Tryouts
by Solar96 Today at 11:13 am
» MEMORIAL DAY 3 HOURS SKILLS CLINIC
by vernonhaynes Today at 11:07 am
» DA/PA tryouts
by Laimport Today at 10:39 am
» DT tryouts - questions for 01 parents
by Chappie81 Today at 10:25 am
» XTREME Camp June 11-14
by freebird Today at 1:04 am
Most active topics
Most Viewed Topics
Top posters
| omega striker (2078) | ||||
| go99 (2016) | ||||
| finish1 (1436) | ||||
| Axxman (983) | ||||
| The German (817) | ||||
| my2cents (816) | ||||
| Ibystander (767) | ||||
| plantit (687) | ||||
| soccerrus2 (647) | ||||
| gababa (572) |
Top posting users this week
Dallas Texans Fall Festival U11 Applied Team List

soccerisgood123- Posts: 226
Join date: 2011-08-09
Location: going to my happy place
nope, all it means is that more paperwork will be required to catch cheaters, more monies spent on security to rein in the idiots who don't know how to behave, less freedom because people can't be trusted to have common sense............

Ace70- Posts: 61
Join date: 2011-08-16
Rocketeer wrote:soccerisgood123 wrote:Atlas comes from a different environment. It’s no excuse for the crowd behavior, but it is a huge variable to consider. There was a definite culture clash.
Yes a culture of dirty play, bad sportsmanship, parents yelling obscenities in front of children and having the police called over a 10 year olds soccer game....absolutely pathetic
Last time I checked the following happens in all CULTURES
Obscenities in front of children
Bad Sportsmanship
Police being called or parents being ejected from games.
Would you like to give ATLAS any kudos for making it to a final that they considered important and showed true emotion for.
Granted based on what I read (cause I was not at the game) they are SORE LOSERS.
On the CULTURE of DIRTY PLAY , obvious you have not watched MEXICAN YOUTH SOCCER and how they play in their Under 18, Under 20 (or 21) National program,
Barcelona type passing, tremendous fitness, and dribbling skills.
Also go look at GREECE when they won the EURO championship, total defense and counter attacks to win against Holland (if memory serves me right). Because when you attack , one leaves gap's in the back. I use GREECE cause maybe one of yall might think that they are not mexicans but more Caucasians.
Really tired with the folks on this board that attack CULTURES, and do not understand SOCCER.
Hell ATLAS lost , the better team won, what's the issue ?
You know Ron Washington right. Let me steal a line with modification for you.
THATS HOW SOCCER GO ?
And we get really tired of comments saying we "do not understand Soccer" and to "Become a true connoisseur of the game" because we differ in our ways of thinking. I guess understanding soccer involves being okay with cheating, dirty play and win at all costs no matter what the consequences. Of course when you you coat it with enough BS then dirty play just becomes caught up in the passion of the moment. Parents swearing in spanish are really are just expressing their thoughts on the heat of the battle.
Last edited by Ace70 on Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:31 am; edited 1 time in total

deankerry- Posts: 2
Join date: 2011-11-21
Ochocinco wrote:mplsnsg wrote:I am getting sucked in and hate it. I do not like calling or naming particular players on this forum. That said, the player you mention scored 1 goal in the afternoon finals, not 3 or 4. He did not play in the semi-final game against Solar red. I must admit that I forgot the show boating after the last score and certainly do not condone the behavior. I suspect the boys got tired of listening to the rants from the Atlas sidelines and having to deal with the foul play that they handled the situation like a 10 or 11 year old would do on the school yard. They are better than that behavior suggests. I will also say that Atlas had a few big boys of their own. Finally, the real final was played in the semis between Solar red and Texans 01. It was a much more competitive game, and either of those two (Solar or Texans) would have won the game against Atlas.
Why did he not play?
He did not play because he got a red card during group play on Saturday night against the Houston Texans. He cussed out a kid from the Houston Texans with the most vile words any one could have imagined. I am not sure a 10 year even knows the words he used (if you get my drift).
This kid is not 10 years old and everyone knows it. I think it is embarrassing for the Texans to even pass him off as a 10 year old. Even if he was 10 years old, wouldn't the Texans be better off playing him up with kids his same size, strength and speed "in the name of development?"
Oh I forgot, it is about rankings, winning trophies and tournaments not about "kids development"...

scrdad- Posts: 301
Join date: 2010-06-22
deankerry wrote: He did not play because he got a red card during group play on Saturday night against the Houston Texans. He cussed out a kid from the Houston Texans with the most vile words any one could have imagined. I am not sure a 10 year even knows the words he used (if you get my drift).
This kid is not 10 years old and everyone knows it. I think it is embarrassing for the Texans to even pass him off as a 10 year old. Even if he was 10 years old, wouldn't the Texans be better off playing him up with kids his same size, strength and speed "in the name of development?"
Oh I forgot, it is about rankings, winning trophies and tournaments not about "kids development"...![]()
I assume your info about the group play incident is correct, in which case the ref did the correct thing and I applaud him/her. I wish more refs would take such a stand, at ALL AGES. Some of the things I've heard during some of the u16 and u18 academy games are ridiculous -- I won't take my younger son to those anymore.
As far as the other vitriol, sounds like sour grapes to me. If you have proof he's not u11, then go use it. Otherwise, just stop it. Do you realize how much trouble one of the big clubs would get in if they were caught using an overage kid? Or are you one of those "types" who thinks that because he is hispanic, he must be lying about his age? Everyone knows one of "those kids" that were substantially bigger than other kids their age who turned out to be of "normal" size. For me, it was my best friend in elementary school -- he was the star athlete, bigger and stronger than everyone. I moved in 6th grade and then came back in 9th grade -- and was taller than him! Plus those Texans must cheat like crazy because they have several tall kids on that team. Those kids must be lying as well.

trblmkr- Posts: 67
Join date: 2010-08-16
in all honesty my bb is pretty much the smallest one on that team so why not conclude he is 6-7 y/o playing u-11. He is not Hispanic. According to players on our team on the field at the time our player cussed, he was cursed at initially. Like I told my son the ref rarely tags the initial crime. So either don't do it or don't get caught. (not talking about cursing).

Rocketeer- Posts: 170
Join date: 2011-07-19
Ace70 wrote:Rocketeer wrote:soccerisgood123 wrote:Atlas comes from a different environment. It’s no excuse for the crowd behavior, but it is a huge variable to consider. There was a definite culture clash.
Yes a culture of dirty play, bad sportsmanship, parents yelling obscenities in front of children and having the police called over a 10 year olds soccer game....absolutely pathetic
Last time I checked the following happens in all CULTURES
Obscenities in front of children
Bad Sportsmanship
Police being called or parents being ejected from games.
Would you like to give ATLAS any kudos for making it to a final that they considered important and showed true emotion for.
Granted based on what I read (cause I was not at the game) they are SORE LOSERS.
On the CULTURE of DIRTY PLAY , obvious you have not watched MEXICAN YOUTH SOCCER and how they play in their Under 18, Under 20 (or 21) National program,
Barcelona type passing, tremendous fitness, and dribbling skills.
Also go look at GREECE when they won the EURO championship, total defense and counter attacks to win against Holland (if memory serves me right). Because when you attack , one leaves gap's in the back. I use GREECE cause maybe one of yall might think that they are not mexicans but more Caucasians.
Really tired with the folks on this board that attack CULTURES, and do not understand SOCCER.
Hell ATLAS lost , the better team won, what's the issue ?
You know Ron Washington right. Let me steal a line with modification for you.
THATS HOW SOCCER GO ?
And we get really tired of comments saying we "do not understand Soccer" and to "Become a true connoisseur of the game" because we differ in our ways of thinking. I guess understanding soccer involves being okay with cheating, dirty play and win at all costs no matter what the consequences. Of course when you you coat it with enough BS then dirty play just becomes caught up in the passion of the moment. Parents swearing in spanish are really are just expressing their thoughts on the heat of the battle.
Let me know how you think soccer should be played? . I am also curious as to how my thinking is different than yours.

deankerry- Posts: 2
Join date: 2011-11-21
trblmkr wrote:in all honesty my bb is pretty much the smallest one on that team so why not conclude he is 6-7 y/o playing u-11. He is not Hispanic. According to players on our team on the field at the time our player cussed, he was cursed at initially. Like I told my son the ref rarely tags the initial crime. So either don't do it or don't get caught. (not talking about cursing).
Why is everybody trying to drop race into this when I didn't even bring it up? Two feet taller than players and going through puberty at 10 years old is a little odd, wouldn't you think? I just think it is very sad that your team puts him out there like he is 10 years old. The Texans would still be good without him just not great.
By the way, this kid did not say anything to him. It is the quietest kid on the team. The referee was right there and heard the whole thing.
Keep it classy, Dallas Texans...

staywide- Posts: 14
Join date: 2010-09-13
The ending of the game has not been properly described. Atlas was losing 3-0 with 6 mins left...the ball was at mid-field and the Atlas coach was trying to call a TIME OUT (yes, that's right)...the Atlas goalie starts jogging to the sideline....the Texans won the ball, passed it to their "big Texan" forward, and he dribbled into an empty net (for his only goal of the game). The Atlas coach came out on the field yelling at the ref, and after several warnings...she blew the whistle and called the game. There were apparently several threats being made towards the Texans boys, and JG Sr. pulled the boys to their bench and kept them there while the Atlas parents stood at mid-field with their boys. They didn't leave until security/police arrived. The Texans boys walked up as a team to get their awards, and the Farmers Branch police got to watch. 20 yards away the Atlas parents and coach handed out their undeserved second place medals (if a team is disqualified in this manner...they do not deserve an award in my book).
The Championship was Texans Gall v Solar Red in the semi's. What a battle. The game could have gone either way, and it was unfortunate they had to play in the semi's. The reason they played in the semi's is a mystery.
Bracket A Winner (Texans Gall) vs Wildcard (Texans Houston)
Bracket B Winner (Atlas) vs Bracket C Winnet (Solar Red)
They decided to switch teams since Texans Houston was in the same bracket as Texans Gall. Ok, I can follow that logic. But, Texans Gall had 27 points, Solar Red had 27 points, and Atlad had 20 points. Just don't understand the logic to put Texans Gall vs Solar Red in the semi's when they had the highest points. Solar Red would have crushed Atlas in the semi's, and we already know the outcome vs Texans Gall. Atlas did not deserve to play the Wildcard team and make it to the finals!
The Championship was Texans Gall v Solar Red in the semi's. What a battle. The game could have gone either way, and it was unfortunate they had to play in the semi's. The reason they played in the semi's is a mystery.
Bracket A Winner (Texans Gall) vs Wildcard (Texans Houston)
Bracket B Winner (Atlas) vs Bracket C Winnet (Solar Red)
They decided to switch teams since Texans Houston was in the same bracket as Texans Gall. Ok, I can follow that logic. But, Texans Gall had 27 points, Solar Red had 27 points, and Atlad had 20 points. Just don't understand the logic to put Texans Gall vs Solar Red in the semi's when they had the highest points. Solar Red would have crushed Atlas in the semi's, and we already know the outcome vs Texans Gall. Atlas did not deserve to play the Wildcard team and make it to the finals!

scrdad- Posts: 301
Join date: 2010-06-22
deankerry wrote: Why is everybody trying to drop race into this when I didn't even bring it up? Two feet taller than players and going through puberty at 10 years old is a little odd, wouldn't you think? I just think it is very sad that your team puts him out there like he is 10 years old. The Texans would still be good without him just not great.
Ok, I wanted to see if I just was wrong about how tall this boy was or what because I don't remember him being two feet taller than the other players (I can't comment on the puberty issue, although deankerry apparently has more info on that). I went to the Texans website to look at the team pics (http://www.dallastexans.com/team_page.php?tid=186). I see the "Big Texan," the talented Asian center-mid who is just a bit shorter, a tall blonde kid (whom I think used to be on one of the lower Texans teams), a tall kid with dark hair next to him, and then another tall hispanic boy (looks the striker that scored 2 in the final). I also see six boys who definitely are not tall for their age (no slight intended) -- although they are kneeling, that generally comports with my recollection of the team. Some of the kids are big, some of the kids are average, and some are not as tall, just like a lot of other teams.

staywide- Posts: 14
Join date: 2010-09-13
deankerry wrote:trblmkr wrote:in all honesty my bb is pretty much the smallest one on that team so why not conclude he is 6-7 y/o playing u-11. He is not Hispanic. According to players on our team on the field at the time our player cussed, he was cursed at initially. Like I told my son the ref rarely tags the initial crime. So either don't do it or don't get caught. (not talking about cursing).
Why is everybody trying to drop race into this when I didn't even bring it up? Two feet taller than players and going through puberty at 10 years old is a little odd, wouldn't you think? I just think it is very sad that your team puts him out there like he is 10 years old. The Texans would still be good without him just not great.
By the way, this kid did not say anything to him. It is the quietest kid on the team. The referee was right there and heard the whole thing.
No one said a thing about him when he was average height (at best) when he played U8, 9, 10 academy...for Solar, Andromeda, and FCD. He has been playing in NTX for a while, and numerous team managers have seen his BC. He joined this Texans team this time last year. He hits his growth spirt, puberty, whatever you want to call it...and now it's the Texans fault for playing him. Lol! If he wasn't playing for the Texans u11 team....there are 19 other D1 teams that would take him and his paperwork! In a couple years all the other boys will be the same size and bigger, and not a word will be said about his age. He should enjoy the advantage while he can!
Regarding the foul language. Completely agree, it needs to end.
Keep it classy, Dallas Texans...

mplsnsg- Posts: 102
Join date: 2010-07-15
Location: looking through your window
trblmkr wrote:in all honesty my bb is pretty much the smallest one on that team so why not conclude he is 6-7 y/o playing u-11. He is not Hispanic. According to players on our team on the field at the time our player cussed, he was cursed at initially. Like I told my son the ref rarely tags the initial crime. So either don't do it or don't get caught. (not talking about cursing).
I would challenge you on that point. I think my child is the smallest.
In any event, it was a surreal ending to a wonderful weekend of soccer for our boys. They had an opportunity to get acquainted with, to learn from, and bond with the senior Gall. He is a true gentleman. They had a blast and will likely remember trying to and being able to complete the tournament win for the Coach's dad. They had the opportunity to see where Junior comes from. They had the the opportunity to hear many of the phrases and sayings they get from Junior from the original source. They got an opportunity to hear and see things from a slightly different vantage point. They enjoyed their time with Gall Sr. They universally wanted pictures taken with him after the final and were excited that he got to take home the first place trophy.
Last edited by mplsnsg on Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:28 pm; edited 1 time in total

krowdkontrol- Posts: 213
Join date: 2011-09-15
Location: Great state of TEXAS
Rocketeer wrote:Ace70 wrote:Rocketeer wrote:soccerisgood123 wrote:Atlas comes from a different environment. It’s no excuse for the crowd behavior, but it is a huge variable to consider. There was a definite culture clash.
Yes a culture of dirty play, bad sportsmanship, parents yelling obscenities in front of children and having the police called over a 10 year olds soccer game....absolutely pathetic
Last time I checked the following happens in all CULTURES
Obscenities in front of children
Bad Sportsmanship
Police being called or parents being ejected from games.
Would you like to give ATLAS any kudos for making it to a final that they considered important and showed true emotion for.
Granted based on what I read (cause I was not at the game) they are SORE LOSERS.
On the CULTURE of DIRTY PLAY , obvious you have not watched MEXICAN YOUTH SOCCER and how they play in their Under 18, Under 20 (or 21) National program,
Barcelona type passing, tremendous fitness, and dribbling skills.
Also go look at GREECE when they won the EURO championship, total defense and counter attacks to win against Holland (if memory serves me right). Because when you attack , one leaves gap's in the back. I use GREECE cause maybe one of yall might think that they are not mexicans but more Caucasians.
Really tired with the folks on this board that attack CULTURES, and do not understand SOCCER.
Hell ATLAS lost , the better team won, what's the issue ?
You know Ron Washington right. Let me steal a line with modification for you.
THATS HOW SOCCER GO ?
And we get really tired of comments saying we "do not understand Soccer" and to "Become a true connoisseur of the game" because we differ in our ways of thinking. I guess understanding soccer involves being okay with cheating, dirty play and win at all costs no matter what the consequences. Of course when you you coat it with enough BS then dirty play just becomes caught up in the passion of the moment. Parents swearing in spanish are really are just expressing their thoughts on the heat of the battle.
Let me know how you think soccer should be played? . I am also curious as to how my thinking is different than yours.
Congrats to Texans Gall on winning the championship. I am surprise no one is talking about how they switched up the Semi Finals. My BB really wanted to see Atlas play against Solar Red. My bb and I instead watched Solar Red vs Texans Gall. Great game though. Cant wait for the Spring Classic season to start.

staywide- Posts: 14
Join date: 2010-09-13
Look at a few posts above, regarding the "switch."

scrdad- Posts: 301
Join date: 2010-06-22
staywide wrote:
The Championship was Texans Gall v Solar Red in the semi's. What a battle. The game could have gone either way, and it was unfortunate they had to play in the semi's. The reason they played in the semi's is a mystery.
Bracket A Winner (Texans Gall) vs Wildcard (Texans Houston)
Bracket B Winner (Atlas) vs Bracket C Winnet (Solar Red)
They decided to switch teams since Texans Houston was in the same bracket as Texans Gall. Ok, I can follow that logic. But, Texans Gall had 27 points, Solar Red had 27 points, and Atlad had 20 points. Just don't understand the logic to put Texans Gall vs Solar Red in the semi's when they had the highest points. Solar Red would have crushed Atlas in the semi's, and we already know the outcome vs Texans Gall. Atlas did not deserve to play the Wildcard team and make it to the finals!
Were they afraid of the "Homer" accusation they would've heard had they kept it as is and gave Gall an easier road to the finals? Or maybe they thought that a team coming all the way from Mexico deserved a real shot to get to the final instead of losing to SR or DT? Don't get me wrong, I think it should either have stayed as published or been done strictly on merit (i.e., flipping the two lowest seeded teams instead of flipping the lowest seed for a team tied for the top seed). As it turns out, it was totally not fair to the team that lost the SR-DT semi.

PG-Boy- Posts: 249
Join date: 2011-03-12
Location: Dallas - North
RE: Mystery Semi-Final Switcharoo
People were talking about it, but I guess it was overshadowed by the Final game.
Do the rules allow the organizers to switch up the games? If yes, what is the criteria?
The Texans dominant player had been carded the night before in their 2-1 win, so he was out for the semi-final.
Would a rematch with the SAME team the following day, sans their star, be the cause of the switcharoo. The schedule did show Bracket A winner vs Wildcard. I'm assuming the 2-1 byline indicated the match was fairly close. I'm also assuming it could be even a closer match-up with the Texans missing THE key player on the roster.
On the other hand, since the schedulers had carte-blanche, they could've matched up Texans against Atlas in the semi-final. But at this point, Atlas was still a big risk. Atlas had already defeated FCD Premier and Texans South, two Top 5 squads. And tied a very good team from Kansas to win the group. Would the Texans risk matching up against Atlas while missing their star player?
Perhaps with the Texans tasked with facing one of three possible tough opponents they selected to schedule Solar Red.
This would give them time to scout Atlas during the semis. Of the three possible opponents, perhaps they decided that Solar would be a better match without their star play-maker. Solar Red is a known quantity to the Texans, there wouldn't be any surprises. It would be the best of the three options (in the theoretical decision making).
The schedule makers had to know there would be questions.
Conversely; Solar Red would've had a much higher success percentage by playing against Atlas or Texans (STX) to reach the Final, that's my spin. We will never know.
People were talking about it, but I guess it was overshadowed by the Final game.
Do the rules allow the organizers to switch up the games? If yes, what is the criteria?
The Texans dominant player had been carded the night before in their 2-1 win, so he was out for the semi-final.
Would a rematch with the SAME team the following day, sans their star, be the cause of the switcharoo. The schedule did show Bracket A winner vs Wildcard. I'm assuming the 2-1 byline indicated the match was fairly close. I'm also assuming it could be even a closer match-up with the Texans missing THE key player on the roster.
On the other hand, since the schedulers had carte-blanche, they could've matched up Texans against Atlas in the semi-final. But at this point, Atlas was still a big risk. Atlas had already defeated FCD Premier and Texans South, two Top 5 squads. And tied a very good team from Kansas to win the group. Would the Texans risk matching up against Atlas while missing their star player?
Perhaps with the Texans tasked with facing one of three possible tough opponents they selected to schedule Solar Red.
This would give them time to scout Atlas during the semis. Of the three possible opponents, perhaps they decided that Solar would be a better match without their star play-maker. Solar Red is a known quantity to the Texans, there wouldn't be any surprises. It would be the best of the three options (in the theoretical decision making).
The schedule makers had to know there would be questions.
Conversely; Solar Red would've had a much higher success percentage by playing against Atlas or Texans (STX) to reach the Final, that's my spin. We will never know.
Last edited by PG-Boy on Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo on the word dominant)

moveyourfeet- Posts: 47
Join date: 2009-11-16
PG-Boy wrote:RE: Mystery Semi-Final Switcharoo
People were talking about it, but I guess it was overshadowed by the Final game.
Do the rules allow the organizers to switch up the games? If yes, what is the criteria?
The Texans dominant player had been carded the night before in their 2-1 win, so he was out for the semi-final.
Would a rematch with the SAME team the following day, sans their star, be the cause of the switcharoo. The schedule did show Bracket A winner vs Wildcard. I'm assuming the 2-1 byline indicated the match was fairly close. I'm also assuming it could be even a closer match-up with the Texans missing THE key player on the roster.
On the other hand, since the schedulers had carte-blanche, they could've matched up Texans against Atlas in the semi-final. But at this point, Atlas was still a big risk. Atlas had already defeated FCD Premier and Texans South, two Top 5 squads. And tied a very good team from Kansas to win the group. Would the Texans risk matching up against Atlas while missing their star player?
Perhaps with the Texans tasked with facing one of three possible tough opponents they selected to schedule Solar Red.
This would give them time to scout Atlas during the semis. Of the three possible opponents, perhaps they decided that Solar would be a better match without their star play-maker. Solar Red is a known quantity to the Texans, there wouldn't be any surprises. It would be the best of the three options (in the theoretical decision making).
The schedule makers had to know there would be questions.
Conversely; Solar Red would've had a much higher success percentage by playing against Atlas or Texans (STX) to reach the Final, that's my spin. We will never know.
Don't know the situation exactly, but this is a common practice in tournaments.
When the wildcard comes out of a bracket and is faced up against a team they have
already played from the same bracket, they will switch the matchups. The semi-finals
are set on the website just to have a place holder for teams and have the field and
times assigned, but the matchups are not final. They just have it setup the way it is.
If the wildcard came out of another bracket, the matchups would have stayed the
same. No conspiracy here.

trblmkr- Posts: 67
Join date: 2010-08-16
your spin is interesting. The person who made the final decision had to be reached by cell phone and was not at FBP, and what anyone can be sure of is Texans will play whoever is next on schedule, whether its a tourney or league play. We showed up to play a team that we thought we had played the night before. Three different team mgrs were attempting to figure it out. Word came down via cell phone and we played. There was no scouting. Truth be known there was no scouting needed. The atlas team was not impressive at all at anytime in tourney. I'm positive the powers in charge had better things to do then protect any team until the finals. This scenario has happened to our team before. Btw the score in the game the night before vs the Texans team from Houston was 3-1.

afrankw- Posts: 384
Join date: 2009-06-28
Age: 51
trblmkr wrote:your spin is interesting. The person who made the final decision had to be reached by cell phone and was not at FBP, and what anyone can be sure of is Texans will play whoever is next on schedule, whether its a tourney or league play. We showed up to play a team that we thought we had played the night before. Three different team mgrs were attempting to figure it out. Word came down via cell phone and we played. There was no scouting. Truth be known there was no scouting needed. The atlas team was not impressive at all at anytime in tourney. I'm positive the powers in charge had better things to do then protect any team until the finals. This scenario has happened to our team before. Btw the score in the game the night before vs the Texans team from Houston was 3-1.
Every Tournament that I have been in the widecard team does not play a team for the same bracket if possible. That is for the first round, Quarter or Semi final or. So, yes they will switch them.

peregrino- Posts: 30
Join date: 2011-09-16
moveyourfeet wrote:PG-Boy wrote:RE: Mystery Semi-Final Switcharoo
People were talking about it, but I guess it was overshadowed by the Final game.
Do the rules allow the organizers to switch up the games? If yes, what is the criteria?
The Texans dominant player had been carded the night before in their 2-1 win, so he was out for the semi-final.
Would a rematch with the SAME team the following day, sans their star, be the cause of the switcharoo. The schedule did show Bracket A winner vs Wildcard. I'm assuming the 2-1 byline indicated the match was fairly close. I'm also assuming it could be even a closer match-up with the Texans missing THE key player on the roster.
On the other hand, since the schedulers had carte-blanche, they could've matched up Texans against Atlas in the semi-final. But at this point, Atlas was still a big risk. Atlas had already defeated FCD Premier and Texans South, two Top 5 squads. And tied a very good team from Kansas to win the group. Would the Texans risk matching up against Atlas while missing their star player?
Perhaps with the Texans tasked with facing one of three possible tough opponents they selected to schedule Solar Red.
This would give them time to scout Atlas during the semis. Of the three possible opponents, perhaps they decided that Solar would be a better match without their star play-maker. Solar Red is a known quantity to the Texans, there wouldn't be any surprises. It would be the best of the three options (in the theoretical decision making).
The schedule makers had to know there would be questions.
Conversely; Solar Red would've had a much higher success percentage by playing against Atlas or Texans (STX) to reach the Final, that's my spin. We will never know.
Don't know the situation exactly, but this is a common practice in tournaments.
When the wildcard comes out of a bracket and is faced up against a team they have
already played from the same bracket, they will switch the matchups. The semi-finals
are set on the website just to have a place holder for teams and have the field and
times assigned, but the matchups are not final. They just have it setup the way it is.
If the wildcard came out of another bracket, the matchups would have stayed the
same. No conspiracy here.
They did just the same in the other division,Accord to the originals rules the wildcard vs the 1st place in the A bracket but they switch the matchups with no reason.
That way 2 teams fromm FC Dallas faced up against in semifinals not in the Final.

hatrick- Posts: 63
Join date: 2011-10-07
I feel shorted after watching 3 games w/ a total of 2 goals for our side. Although I did hear (from several fields over) some music that contained accordions and fanatics with flappers, or whatever the hell that was.
In hindsight, Im happy with our two goals and to have the kids go home on a positive.
In hindsight, Im happy with our two goals and to have the kids go home on a positive.

hatrick- Posts: 63
Join date: 2011-10-07
And as far as "The Big Texan" goes he definitely, recently (in the last 6-9 months), had a growth spurt. He was a good player w/ average size just last year. And, he maybe 11 by now. That's legal.

typical- Posts: 45
Join date: 2010-12-02
This might not be much of a value-add to some of you, but I just want to say that although my BB's team did not play to their potential this weekend, the tournament itself was really exciting due to the out-of-town teams. It was a good experience for our boys, myself included. I spent half the game talking to one of the Houstonian dads and he was the most genuine, kind and even-tempered persons I've ever met. The other parents were, well, just like any other parent I met from the fall Classic league (passionate, emotional, supporting). I look forward to seeing that dad (Apollo) and their team in any future tournament! I enjoy the challenge and diversity that these teams bring, and my BB and I are embracing it because we know that the exposure to other teams will gauge where we stand in the broader scope of soccer. This experience will only make us stronger!

scrdad- Posts: 301
Join date: 2010-06-22
typical wrote:This might not be much of a value-add to some of you, but I just want to say that although my BB's team did not play to their potential this weekend, the tournament itself was really exciting due to the out-of-town teams. It was a good experience for our boys, myself included. I spent half the game talking to one of the Houstonian dads and he was the most genuine, kind and even-tempered persons I've ever met. The other parents were, well, just like any other parent I met from the fall Classic league (passionate, emotional, supporting). I look forward to seeing that dad (Apollo) and their team in any future tournament! I enjoy the challenge and diversity that these teams bring, and my BB and I are embracing it because we know that the exposure to other teams will gauge where we stand in the broader scope of soccer. This experience will only make us stronger!
And that's the way it should be!



moveyourfeet